Niemi et al v. Burgess et al

Filing 97

MINUTE ENTRY for Motion Hearing held before Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 7/30/2012. Granting in part and denying in part 86 Motion for TRO. Court Reporter: Gwen Daniel. (lag)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO JUDGE R. BROOKE JACKSON Courtroom Deputy: Laura Galera Court Reporter: Gwen Daniel Date: July 30, 2012 Civil Action No. 12-cv-00869-RBJ Parties: Counsel: JOHN NIEMI, ROBERT NAEGELE, III, and JESPER PARNEVIK, Christopher Madel (by phone) Robert Miller Bruce Manning (by phone) Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL FRANK BURGESS, ERWIN LASSHOFER, INNOVATIS GMBH, INNOVATIS IMMOBILIEN GMBH, INNOVATIS ASSET MANAGEMENT SA, LEXINGTON CAPITAL & PROPERTY INVESTMENTS, LLC, and BARRY FUNT, CREDIT SUISSE, AG Defendants. Phillip Douglas Kathleen Craigmile Julie North Justine Beyda COURTROOM MINUTES MOTION HEARING Court in session: 2:00 p.m. Appearances of counsel. Mr. Douglas addresses the Court regarding entering a special appearance. Court addresses the parties. Argument by Mr. Madel, Mr. Douglas and Ms. Craigmile as to Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order Doc.# [86]. Discussion regarding a request for a bond. For the reasons as stated on the record it is: ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order Doc.# [86] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. ORDERED: Court issues a temporary restraining order in part. Defendant Credit Suisse is restrained from permitting the Innovatis Groups and Mr. Lasshofer from removing any money from the Credit Suisse accounts of any number that contain any of the $6.8 million fund in question until an evidentiary hearing is held. ORDERED: Parties to contact chambers to set a hearing regarding jurisdiction. Court in recess: 3:49 p.m. Hearing concluded. Total time: 01:49 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?