Patrick Collins, Inc., et al., v. Boussetta, et al.,

Filing 11

ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT KHALID BOUSSETTA, ONLY. Plaintiff's [sic] Notice of Settlement and Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice of Defendant, Khalid Boussetta Only 10 filed May 9, 2012, is APPROVED. Plaintiffs' claims against defendant Khalid Boussetta are DISMISSED with prejudice. Defendant Khalid Boussetta is DROPPED as a named party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 5/9/12. (mjgsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 12-cv-00887-REB-MEH PATRICK COLLINS, INC., and THIRD DEGREE FILMS, Plaintiffs, v. KHALID BOUSSETTA, and ERIC RATLIFF, Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT KHALID BOUSSETTA, ONLY Blackburn, J. The matter is before me on the Plaintiff’s [sic] Notice of Settlement and Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice of Defendant, Khalid Boussetta Only [#10]1 filed May 9, 2012. After reviewing the notice and the file, I conclude that the notice should be approved and that plaintiffs’ claims against defendant Khalid Boussetta should be dismissed with prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That Plaintiff’s [sic] Notice of Settlement and Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice of Defendant, Khalid Boussetta Only [#10] filed May 9, 2012, is APPROVED; 2. That plaintiffs’ claims against defendant Khalid Boussetta are DISMISSED 1 “[#10]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. WITH PREJUDICE; and 3. That defendant Khalid Boussetta is DROPPED as a named party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly. Dated May 9, 2012, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?