Raw Films, Ltd. v. John Does 1-9

Filing 32

MINUTE ORDER granting 21 Defendant Jane Doe 6's Motion to Restrict Access, and granting 23 Jane Doe 6's Motion to Proceed Anonymously. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/15/2012. (mehcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00908-MSK-MEH
RAW FILMS, LTD.,
Plaintiff,
v.
JANE DOE 6,
Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on August 15, 2012.
Having no objection from the Plaintiff, Defendant Jane Doe 6's Motion to Proceed
Anonymously [filed June 21, 2012; docket #23] is granted as follows. Defendant may proceed
anonymously in this matter as “Jane Doe 6” for the purpose of adjudicating her pending motion to
quash. Upon resolution of the motion to quash, should the Defendant perceive a need to continue
proceeding anonymously in this case, the Defendant must then seek permission from the Court to
continue proceeding anonymously.
Further, having met the requirements of D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.2, Defendant Jane Doe 6's
Motion to Restrict Access [filed June 21, 2012; docket #21] is granted in part and denied in part.
Defendant seeks restriction of access to “a motion to quash ... filed concurrently with this motion.”
However, the motion filed concurrently is actually the Motion to Proceed Anonymously, which
contains Defendant’s identifying information.1 Defendant’s Motion to Quash reveals no identifying
information; therefore, the Court will not restrict access to the Motion to Quash. However, the Court
grants Defendant’s request to restrict access to the Motion to Proceed Anonymously, and directs the
Clerk of the Court to maintain the document located at docket #23 under Level 2 restriction until
further order of the Court.
The Court further directs the Clerk of the Court to mail a copy of this order to the address
provided by Defendant in the filing at docket #23.

1

The Court perceives Defendant’s request as simply containing a typographical error.