Norris v. Buena Vista Correctional Complex et al

Filing 37

FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk, re: 36 Order. By Clerk on 1/3/14. (mnfsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-00924-DME-KMT TODD NORRIS, Plaintiff, v. BUENA VISTA CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX; COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; JOHN DOES 1-5, whose true names and identities are unknown; RICHARD FISHER, individually, as an employee operating under the color of state law for the Buena Vista Correctional Complex; CAROL McCORMACK, individually, as an employee operating under the color of state law for the Buena Vista Correctional Complex; and TIMOTHY VAUGHN, individually, as an employee operating under the color of state law for the Buena Vista Correctional Complex, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered. Pursuant to the Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation And Dismissing Claims Without Prejudice [Docket No. 36] of Senior Circuit Judge David M. Ebel entered on December 30, 2013 it is ORDERED that the Court ADOPTS the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya entered on December 12, 2013 and DISMISSES without prejudice plaintiff’s claims against defendants Richard Fisher, Carol McCormack and Timothy Vaughn. It is FURTHER ORDERED that because this order resolves all of plaintiff’s claims and to the extent the Court previously dismissed with prejudice plaintiff’s claims against defendants Buena Vista Correctional Complex, Colorado Department of Corrections and John Does 1-5 [Docket No. 18], judgment shall enter in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case is closed in its entirety. Dated at Denver, Colorado this 3rd day of January, 2014. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK s/Kathy Preuitt-Parks Kathy Preuitt-Parks Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?