VRC, LLC v. RCR Vail, LLC et al

Filing 79

Courtroom Minutes for Motions Hearing held on 10/7/2014 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Plaintiff's First Claim for Relief Violation of 15 U.S.C.S. §1703 (a)(2)(D) of the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act vs. RCR Vail is dismissed as barred by the statute of limitations. Plaintiff's Tenth, Eleventh and Twelfth Claims for Relief for Violations of C.R.S. 6-1-105(1)(e), (i) and (u) of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act vs. RCR Vail, are dismissed as failure to s how significant public impact. Defendants Slifer Smith and Frampton Vail Associates Real Estate, LLC and Larry Peterson's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 66 , is taken underadvisement. Defendant RCR Vail, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment 67 , is taken under advisement with respect to claims two through nine and thirteen through sixteen. FTR: K. Terasaki. (jsmit)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Date:
October 7, 2014
Courtroom Deputy:
J. Chris Smith
FTR Technician:
Kathy Terasaki
____________________________________________________________________________________
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00928-RPM
VRC, LLC.,
a Colorado Limited Liability Company,

Kerry H. Wallace

Plaintiff,
v.
RCR Vail, LLC.,
Annie T. Kao
a Colorado Limited Liability Company,
LARRY PETERSON,
Curtis W. Shortridge
an individual residing in Colorado and
SILFER, SMITH & FRAMPTON / VAIL ASSOCIATES REAL ESTATE, LLC.,
a Delaware Limited Liability Company,
Defendants.
____________________________________________________________________________________
COURTROOM MINUTES
____________________________________________________________________________________
Hearing on Motions for Summary Judgment
2:00 p.m.

Court in session.

Defendant Peterson present.
Court’s preliminary remarks.
ORDERED:

Plaintiff’s First Claim for Relief Violation of 15 U.S.C.S. §1703 (a)(2)(D) of the
Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act vs. RCR Vail is dismissed as barred by the
statute of limitations.
Plaintiff’s Tenth, Eleventh and Twelfth Claims for Relief for Violations of
C.R.S. 6-1-105(1)(e), (i) and (u) of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act vs.
RCR Vail, are dismissed as failure to show significant public impact.

2:05 p.m.

Argument by Mr. Shortridge [67].

Court’s comments regarding partial summary judgment.
2:07 p.m.

Argument by Ms. Kao [67].

October 7, 2014
12-cv-00928-RPM
2:34 p.m.

Argument by Ms. Wallace.

2:51 p.m.

Rebuttal argument by Ms. Kao

Statements by Mr. Shortridge
ORDERED:

Defendants Slifer Smith and Frampton – Vail Associates Real Estate, LLC and
Larry Peterson’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [66], is taken under
advisement.
Defendant RCR Vail, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment [67], is taken under
advisement with respect to claims two through nine and thirteen through sixteen.

2:55 p.m.

Court in recess.

Hearing concluded. Total time: 55 min.

2