Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. v. Kroger Co., The
Filing
15
CONSENT DECREE. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree as may be necessary or appropriate for the construction or to carry out the terms of this Consent Decree. Subject to the terms set forth herein and the Court's ongoing jurisdiction to enforce the terms and conditions, this case is otherwise dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. The Clerk shall close this case, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 06/19/2012. (wjcsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Honorable Marcia S. Krieger
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00930-MSK-BNB
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE KROGER CO.,
Defendant.
CONSENT DECREE
The matter before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Decree, by
which the parties through their respective attorneys have agreed to the following terms for
resolving this litigation:
1.
The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 15
U.S.C. § 1121 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1131, 1338 and 1367.
2.
Plaintiff Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (“Chipotle”) is the owner of several
trademark and service mark registrations for CHIPOTLE, including U.S. Registration Nos.
2,344,423, 3,523,738, and 3,698,498, issued by the United States patent and Trademark Office.
3.
Defendant The Kroger Co. (“Kroger”) has sold and offered for sale chicken food
items with a label featuring the term “chipotle,” a depiction of which is attached as Exhibit A
(“the Accused Label”).
4.
Chipotle has asserted that Kroger’s use of the Accused Label infringes Chipotle’s
trademark rights in CHIPOTLE, and Kroger denies these allegations, and agrees to enter this
Consent Decree solely to avoid the cost of litigating this matter and without admitting any
liability of any kind on behalf of it, or any of its agents, employees, representatives,
administrators, attorneys, insurers, lenders, shareholders, officers, directors, divisions, affiliates,
partnerships, partners, joint ventures, parent and/or subsidiary corporations, assigns, heirs, nextof-kin, and successors in interest.
5.
Nonetheless, Kroger and each of its affiliates, subsidiaries, officers, agents,
servants, and employees, and all others aiding, abetting or in active concert or participation
therewith, are permanently enjoined from using or displaying the Accused Label. This
injunction extends to all containers, food items, packaging, or advertising on or to which the
Accused Label may appear or be affixed.
6.
If Chipotle believes that Kroger is in violation of the terms of this Consent
Agreement, Chipotle shall give written notice to Kroger’s General Counsel, identifying the
specific stores(s) in which the violation occurred or is occurring, and a minimum of fifteen (15)
days from the date such written notice is delivered to address and cure the identified violation(s)
before filing to enforce this Consent Decree.
7.
So long as the terms and conditions of the Consent Decree are met, each of the
Parties hereby and forever releases and discharges the other (Including, where appropriate, each
of the Parties’ respective predecessors, successors, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, assigns, legal
representatives, agents, employees, servants, attorneys, officers, and directors) from any and all
causes of action, suits, appeals, damages (including, but not limited to, compensatory damages,
tort damages, contract damages and punitive damages), arbitration or other claims, demands,
actions, warranties (whether express or implied), indemnification or subrogation demands,
covenants, debts, dues, duties, rights, costs, fees, and any and all other liabilities and obligations
of any nature whatsoever, whether at law or in equity, tort or contract, statutory or otherwise,
that relate to the Accused Label or the claims and allegations raised in this action.
8.
This Consent Decree will bind and benefit the parties and their respective
successors and assigns.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms and conditions of this
Consent Decree as may be necessary or appropriate for the construction or to
carry out the terms of this Consent Decree.
2.
Subject to the terms set forth herein and the Court’s ongoing jurisdiction to
enforce the terms and conditions, this case is otherwise dismissed.
3.
The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.
4.
The Clerk shall close this case.
DATED this 19th day of June, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
Marcia S. Krieger
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?