Morgan et al v. Clements et al

Filing 81

MINUTE ORDER granting 80 Defendants' Unopposed Motion For Clarification of Briefing Schedule and For Leave To File 20 Page Reply Briefs in Support of Their Motions To Dismiss. The replies shall be due on or before February 15, 2013, and may be up to 20 pages in length. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/5/13. (kfinn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 12-cv-00936-REB-KMT JOHN MORGAN, DUSTIN COOK, PAUL STARK, and JERROD THOELE, Plaintiffs, v. TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, in his official capacity, JEFFREY WELLS, Community Parole Officer, in his individual and official capacities, JIM KELLER, Colorado Department of Corrections Parole Team Leader, in his individual and official capacities, LIESL SCHUMACHER, Colorado Department of Corrections Parole Supervisor, in his individual and official capacities, and JOHN OREY, Colorado Department of Corrections Parole Supervisor, in his individual and official capacities, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER1 The matter is before the court on Defendants’ Unopposed Motion For Clarification of Briefing Schedule and For Leave To File 20 Page Reply Briefs in Support of Their Motions To Dismiss [#80]2 filed February 4, 2013. The motion is granted. The replies shall be due on or before February 15, 2013, and may be up to 20 pages in length. Dated: February 5, 2013 1 This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado. 2 “[#80]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?