Memoryten, Inc. v. LV Administrative Services, Inc. et al
Filing
113
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland: Motion Hearing held on 2/1/2013. 92 The Laurus Parties' Motion to Strike Memoryten Inc.'s Expert Disclosures is DENIED. Status Report due by 2/15/2013. 94 LV Defendants' Renewed Request for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT, written order to issue. FTR: BNB Courtroom A401. (bnbcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND
Civil Action:
Courtroom Deputy:
12-cv-0993-WJM-BNB
Julie Dynes
Date: February 1, 2013
FTR: BNB COURTROOM A-401
Parties
Attorney(s)
MEMORYTEN, INC
Jeffrey G. Jacobs
Plaintiff(s)
v.
LV ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC
LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD
LAURUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC
VALENS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC
VALENS INVESTMENT ADVISORS, LP
SLICON MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS, INC
Defendant(s)
Peter G. Koclanes
COURTROOM MINUTES
MOTION HEARING
Court in Session: 1:31 p.m. Appearance of counsel.
Argument presented on [92] The Laurus Parties’ Motion to Strike Memoryten Inc.’s Expert
Disclosures and [94] LV Defendants’ Renewed Request for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed R.Civ.P.
37.
ORDERED: [92] The Laurus Parties’ Motion to Strike Memoryten Inc.’s Expert
Disclosures is DENIED. Status report to be filed by February 15, 2013 and is
to include whether or not the added defendants are going to participate,
added defendant’s counsel name, and proposed amended scheduling order.
[94] LV Defendants’ Renewed Request for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 37 is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT, written order to issue.
Discussion held on Motion to Amend Counterclaims.
Court in Recess: 2:30 p.m.
Hearing concluded.
Total time in Court: 00:59
* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?