Memoryten, Inc. v. LV Administrative Services, Inc. et al

Filing 113

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland: Motion Hearing held on 2/1/2013. 92 The Laurus Parties' Motion to Strike Memoryten Inc.'s Expert Disclosures is DENIED. Status Report due by 2/15/2013. 94 LV Defendants' Renewed Request for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT, written order to issue. FTR: BNB Courtroom A401. (bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND Civil Action: Courtroom Deputy: 12-cv-0993-WJM-BNB Julie Dynes Date: February 1, 2013 FTR: BNB COURTROOM A-401 Parties Attorney(s) MEMORYTEN, INC Jeffrey G. Jacobs Plaintiff(s) v. LV ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD LAURUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC VALENS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC VALENS INVESTMENT ADVISORS, LP SLICON MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS, INC Defendant(s) Peter G. Koclanes COURTROOM MINUTES MOTION HEARING Court in Session: 1:31 p.m. Appearance of counsel. Argument presented on [92] The Laurus Parties’ Motion to Strike Memoryten Inc.’s Expert Disclosures and [94] LV Defendants’ Renewed Request for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed R.Civ.P. 37. ORDERED: [92] The Laurus Parties’ Motion to Strike Memoryten Inc.’s Expert Disclosures is DENIED. Status report to be filed by February 15, 2013 and is to include whether or not the added defendants are going to participate, added defendant’s counsel name, and proposed amended scheduling order. [94] LV Defendants’ Renewed Request for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT, written order to issue. Discussion held on Motion to Amend Counterclaims. Court in Recess: 2:30 p.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in Court: 00:59 * To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?