Memoryten, Inc. v. LV Administrative Services, Inc. et al

Filing 119

ORDER denying 116 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/20/13.(bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 12-cv-00993-WJM-BNB MEMORYTEN, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. LV ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation, LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD., a Cayman Islands corporation, LAURUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, VALENS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, a New York limited liability company, VALENS INVESTMENT ADVISORS, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, WAY TECHNOLOGY, LLC, SILICON MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS, INC., a Colorado corporation, and SILICON MOUNTAIN MEMORY, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on the plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint [Doc. # 116, filed 2/15/2013] (the “Motion to Amend”). It appears that the amendment in intended solely to substitute Way Tech LLC for Way Technology LLC, but the proposed Second Amended Complaint is not attached to the Motion to Amend. I will not consider a motion to amend unless the proposed amended pleading is attached as an exhibit. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Amend [Doc. # 116] is DENIED without prejudice, to be renewed by a substituted motion which includes the proposed Second Amended Complaint as an exhibit. Dated February 20, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?