Memoryten, Inc. v. LV Administrative Services, Inc. et al
Filing
42
ORDER: 32 MOTION for Leave to Conduct Jurisdictional Discovery filed by Memoryten, Inc is DENIED as moot and unncessary. Plaintiff shall supplement its response to LV Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, if at all, on or before 10/15/12. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/3/12. (bnbcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00993-WJM-BNB
MEMORYTEN, INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
LV ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation,
LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD., a Cayman Islands corporation,
LAURUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
VALENS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, a New York limited liability company,
VALENS INVESTMENT ADVISORS, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and
SILICON MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS, INC., a Colorado corporation,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Conduct Discovery Limited to
the Issue of Personal Jurisdiction [Doc. # 32, filed 7/2/2012] (the “Motion”). I held a hearing
on the Motion this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here.
IT IS ORDERED:
(1)
The Motion [Doc. # 32] is DENIED as moot and unnecessary;
(2)
The plaintiff may conduct the requested discovery pursuant to the Scheduling
Order and, in particular, may inquire into matters concerning the personal jurisdiction issue,
which are relevant in view of the LV Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 18] and
notwithstanding the filing of a response to that motion by the plaintiff; and
(3)
The plaintiff shall supplement its response to the LV Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss, if at all, on or before October 15, 2012.
Dated August 3, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?