Gomez, v. Astrue,

Filing 15

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 8/27/2012. SS Defendants Brief due by 9/26/2012. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 10/11/2012, by Judge John L. Kane on 7/10/12. (sgrim)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.: 12-cv-01012-AP
ANTHONY GOMEZ,
Plaintiff
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant
____________________________________________________________________________
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
_____________________________________________________________________________
1. APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Mark D. Elliot
Alonit Cohen
7884 Ralston Road
Arvada, CO 80002
Telephone: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

For Defendant:
JOHN F. WALSH
United Stated Attorney
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
M. Thayne Warner
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Assistant Regional Council
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 Seventeenth Street
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: [phone]

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.

Date Complaint Was Filed:

April 16, 2012

B.

Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney’s Office: April 27, 2012

C.

Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed:

June 26, 2012

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
Counsel for both Plaintiff and Defendant state that, to the best of their knowledge, the
record is complete and accurate.
5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is
complete and accurate. However, the Plaintiff reserves the right to supplement the
record if necessary at the time of the Opening Brief.
6.
STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL
CLAIMS OR DEFENSES.
The parties state that, to the best of their knowledge, this case does not involve any
unusual claims or defenses.
7.

OTHER MATTERS

There are no other matters anticipated.
8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.

Plaintiff’s Opening Brief Due:

August 27, 2012

B.

Defendant’s Response Brief Due:

September 26, 2012

C.

Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due:

October 11, 2012

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
Plaintiff requests oral argument.
Defendant does not request oral argument.

10.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A. ( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge.
B. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United
States Magistrate Judge

11.

OTHER MATTERS

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES
MUST COMPLY WITH D.C. COLO. LCiv 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A
COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY’S
CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
12.

AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

None.
DATED this 10th day of July, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

_S/John L. Kane_________
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
/s/Alonit Cohen
Alonit Cohen
7884 Ralston Road
Arvada, CO 80002
Telephone [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ M. Thayne Warner
M. Thayne Warner
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1001 Seventeenth Street
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Defendant