Putnam v. Astrue et al

Filing 9

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiff's Brief due by 8/8/2012. SS Defendant's Brief due by 9/10/2012. SS Plaintiff's Reply Brief due by 9/21/2012, by Judge John L. Kane on 7/5/12. (lygsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.: 12-cv-01025-JLK

KATHRYN A. PUTNAM,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES:
For Plaintiff:

For Defendant:

ANN J. ATKINSON
Attorney at Law
7960 S. Ireland Way
Aurora, CO 80016-1904
Tele: 303-680-1881
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

JOHN F. WALSH,
United States Attorney
District of Colorado
WILLIAM PHARO,
Assistant United States
Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
1225 - 17th St., #700
Denver, CO 80202
Tele: 303-844-7278
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Robert L. Van Saghi
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Social Security Administration

Office of the General Counsel
1001 Seventeenth St.
Denver, CO 80202
303-844-1948
[e-mail]
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42
U.S.C. 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint was filed:

April 17, 2012

B. Date Complaint was served on U.S. Attorney’s office: April 23, 2012.
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record were filed: June 15, 2012.
4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD:
The Administrative Record appears to be complete.
5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL
CLAIMS OR DEFENSES.
There are no unusual claims or defenses in this case.
7. OTHER MATTERS
There are no other matters to bring to the Court’s attention.
8. PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due:

August 8, 2012

B. Defendant's Response Brief Due:
September 10, 2012
C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: September 21, 2012
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.

Plaintiff’s statement:
Plaintiff does not request oral argument.

B.

Defendant’s statement
Defendant does not request oral argument.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A.
( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a
United States Magistrate Judge.
B.
( X ) All parties have NOT consented to the exercise of jurisdiction
of a United States Magistrate Judge.
11. OTHER MATTERS
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR
CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY
SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED
UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY’S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEY’S OF RECORD,
AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended
only upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 5th day of July, 2012.

s/John L. Kane
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED:
s/ Ann J. Atkinson
Ann J. Atkinson, Attorney at Law
7960 South Ireland Way
Aurora, CO 80016-1904
Tele: 303-680-1881
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
s/ Robert L. Van Saghi
By: Robert L. Van Saghi, Esq.
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1001 Seventeenth St.
Denver, CO 80202
303-844-1948
[e-mail]