American Enterprise Bank, v. Spring Hill Holdings LLC, et al.,

Filing 79

ORDER Granting the Parties 78 Joint Motion Requesting Administrative Closure of the Case, by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/19/2013. (ervsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 12-cv-1032-WJM-MJW
AMERICAN ENTERPRISE BANK, an Illinois state bank
Plaintiff,
v.
SPRING HILL HOLDINGS, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company
GEMINI FITNESS GROUP, INC., a Colorado corporation d/b/a ORCHARD ATHLETIC
CLUB,
AINSLEE MACEACHRAN,
HUGH MACEACHRAN,
ELIZABETH MACEACHRAN,
JOHN MACEACHRAN,
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION,
WATERBURY ORCHARDS, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and
PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF LARIMER COUNTY
Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION REQUESTING
ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSURE OF THE CASE

This matter comes before the Court on the Parties’ Joint Motion Requesting
Administrative Closure of the Case, filed on August 8, 2016. (ECF No. 78). The Court,
having reviewed the Motion and being fully advised, hereby ORDERS as follows:
The Parties’ Joint Motion is GRANTED. (ECF No. 78). Pursuant to
D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, the Court hereby ORDERS that the above-captioned case be
ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. The parties may later seek to reopen this case for
good cause shown.1
1

The Court welcomes the Parties’ settlement efforts and progress toward same, as well
as the request for administrative closure of this case at this juncture of the proceedings. But it is

Dated this 19th day of August, 2013.
BY THE COURT:

_______________________
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge

must be noted that the Court’s Revised Practice Standard III.B, provides that “[a]ll
requests...must be contained in a separate, written motion” and also D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1
requiring that “a motion shall be made in a separate paper.” Here, the Court notes that the
request for administrative closure also included a status report. The Court waives compliance
with the above practice rules, in this instance. However, should the Parties seek to reopen this
case for any reason, and provide a status report simultaneously, such documents should be
filed in separate filings so to comport with the above practice rules.

2