Lips, et al., v. Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe County, et al.,
Filing
23
ORDER of Consolidation. ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall docket this Order in both cases. ORDERED that all pleadings and other filings shall hereafter be filed in the lower numbered case only, Civil Action No. 11-cv-01103-WYD-MJW, using the caption appearing in this Order. ORDERED that Civil Action No. 11-cv-01107 shall hereafter be referred to the magistrate judge assigned to the lowest case, in this case Magistrate Judge Watanabe (jjhsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01103-WYD-MJW
VIRGILIUS LIPS and
LYNDA LIPS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ARAPAHOE COUNTY;
ARAPAHOE COUNTY SHERIFF GRAYSON ROBINSON, In his official capacity;
AGENT MATT HANAGAN, in his individual and official capacities;
INVESTIGATOR CRAIG TANGEMAN, in his individual and official capacities;
OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, in his individual and official capacities;
OFFICER JOHN DOE #3, in his individual and official capacities;
OFFICER JOHN DOE #4, in his individual and official capacities; and
OFFICER JOHN DOE #5, in his individual and official capacities,
Defendants.
_________________________________________________________________
Consolidated with
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01107-WYD-BNB
MELVEN LIPS and
JULIEN LIPS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ARAPAHOE COUNTY;
ARAPAHOE COUNTY SHERIFF GRAYSON ROBINSON, in his official capacity;
AGENT MATT HANAGAN, in his individual and official capacities;
INVESTIGATOR CRAIG TANGEMAN, in his individual and official capacities;
OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, in his individual and official capacities; and
OFFICER JOHN DOE #2, in his individual and official capacities,
Defendants.
ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION
THIS MATTER is before the Court on a review of the files. On June 14, 2012, I
issued an Order to Show Cause in both of the above-referenced cases asking the
parties to show cause why the cases should not be consolidated. The parties have filed
responses indicating that consolidation is appropriate. I agree for the reasons stated
below.
Fed. R. Civ. P.42(a) provides that “[w]hen actions involving a common question
of law or fact are pending before the court, it may order a joint hearing or trial of any or
all the matters in issue in the action; it may order all the actions consolidated; and it may
make such orders concerning proceedings therein as may tend to avoid unnecessary
costs or delay.” Consolidation is within the discretion of the trial court. Gillette Motor
Transport v. Northern Oklahoma Butane Co., 179 F.2d 711, 712 (10th Cir. 1950). I find
that the two cases at issue involve common questions of law and fact involving the
alleged use of excessive force and other alleged violations of law when the Lips’
residence was searched on April 29, 2010. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the two-above referenced cases are consolidated for all further
purposes. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall docket this Order in both
cases. It is
-2-
FURTHER ORDERED that all pleadings and other filings shall hereafter be filed
in the lower numbered case only, Civil Action No. 11-cv-01103-WYD-MJW, using the
caption appearing in this Order. Finally, it is
ORDERED that Civil Action No. 11-cv-01107 shall hereafter be referred to the
magistrate judge assigned to the lowest case, in this case Magistrate Judge Watanabe.
Dated: June 29, 2012
BY THE COURT:
s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
Wiley Y. Daniel
Chief United States District Judge
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?