Shepard, v. Rangel et al.,

Filing 58

MINUTE ORDER granting 54 Motion for Order. The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of Docket Nos. 38 , 42 , and 45 to Plaintiff at his address listed on the electronic docket. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 12/03/12. (alvsl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-01108-RBJ-KLM ROBERT DALE SHEPARD, Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA RANGEL, ADX General Population Unit Manager, individually, DAVID FOSTER, ADX Counselor, individually, FNU GEORGE, ADX Correctional Officer, individually, FNU SHEPHERD, ADX Correctional Officer, individually, FNU ROY, ADX Correctional Officer, individually, JOHN DOE #1G, whose true name is unknown, ADX Correctional Officer, individually, and JOHN DOE # 2G, whose true name is unknown, ADX Correctional Officer, individually, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Order [Docket No. 54; Filed November 29, 2012] (the “Motion”). In the Motion, Plaintiff seeks a copy of the Minute Order [#38] granting his request for an extension of time to file a Response to Defendant Patricia Rangel’s Motion to Dismiss [#20] and a copy of Defendant Joshua George’s Motion to Dismiss [#42]. The Court notes that both of these Motions to Dismiss [#20, #42] as well as Defendant Darren Foster’s Motion to Dismiss [#39] and Defendant Daniel Shepherd’s Motion to Dismiss [#40], were denied as moot in a Minute Order [#45] dated November 9, 2012. However, as a one-time courtesy to Plaintiff, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#54] is GRANTED. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of Docket Nos. 38, 42, and 45 to Plaintiff at his address listed on the electronic docket. Dated: December 3, 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?