Torres v. Astrue

Filing 12

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 10/15/2012. SS Defendants Brief due by 11/14/2012. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 11/29/2012, by Judge John L. Kane on 9/6/12. (sgrim)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01125-JLK
ELIZABETH M. TORRES
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
______________________________________________________________________________
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Michael W. Seckar
402 W. 12th Street
Pueblo, CO 81003
Telephone [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

For Defendant:
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
[e-mail]
THAYNE WARNER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 Seventeenth Street
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]

1

2.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. ' 405(g).
3.

DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.
C.

4.

Date Complaint Was Filed: April 30, 2011
Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney’s Office: June 19, 2012
Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: August 13, 2012

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and
accurate. However, the Plaintiff reserves the right to supplement the record if necessary at the time
of the Opening Brief.
5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.
6.

STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS
OR DEFENSES

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe this case raises unusual claims or
defenses.
7.

OTHER MATTERS
There are no other matters anticipated.

8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.
B.
C.

9.

STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
B.

10.

Plaintiff’s Opening Brief Due: October 15, 2012
Defendant’s Response Brief Due: November 14, 2012
Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: November 29, 2012

Plaintiff’s Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
Defendant’s Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

2

11.

OTHER MATTERS

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY’S CLIENT, ALL
ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
12.

AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a
showing of good cause.
DATED this 6th day of August, 2012.
BY THE COURT:

s/John L. Kane
__________
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
[e-mail]

/s/ Michael W. Seckar
402 W. 12th Street
Pueblo, CO 81003
Telephone [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff

By: /s/ M. Thayne Warner
M. Thayne Warner
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1001 Seventeenth Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant

3