Stephens v. Astrue
Filing
11
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiff's Brief due by 8/28/2012. SS Defendant's Brief due by 9/28/2012. SS Plaintiff's Reply Brief due by 10/15/2012, by Judge John L. Kane on 7/23/12. (lygsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01162-AP
TAMMY S. STEPHENS,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,
Plaintiff.
______________________________________________________________________________
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
______________________________________________________________________________
1.
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
For Plaintiff:
For Defendant:
Michael S. Krieger, Attorney
165 South Union Blvd., #555
Lakewood CO 80228
303-781-5559
Fax: 303-781-1349
m.krieger@comcast.net
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
District of Colorado
Debra J. Meachum
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1001 17th Street, Sixth Floor
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: (303) 844-1570
Fax: (303) 844-0770
debra.meachum@ssa.gov
2.
STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
405(g).
3.
DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 5/3/12.
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 5/4/12.
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 7/3/12.
4.
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
Plaintiff states: upon preliminary review, it appears to be adequate.
Defendant states, to the best of his knowledge, that the administrative record is complete
and accurate.
5.
STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
None at this time.
6.
STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL
CLAIMS OR DEFENSES
None at this time.
7.
OTHER MATTERS
None at this time.
8.
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due:
8/28/12
B. Defendant's Response Brief Due:
9/28/12
C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 10/15/12
9.
STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
B.
10.
Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.
CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A.
B.
( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge.
(X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge.
11.
OTHER MATTERS
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL
ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
12.
AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a
showing of good cause.
DATED this 23rd day of July, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane
_______
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
For Plaintiff:
/s/ Michael S. Krieger
Michael S. Krieger, Attorney
165 South Union Blvd., #555
Lakewood CO 80228
303-781-5559
Fax: 303-781-1349
m.krieger@comcast.net
For Defendant:
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
District of Colorado
/s/ Debra J. Meachum
Debra J. Meachum
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1001 17th Street, Sixth Floor
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: (303) 844-1570
Fax: (303) 844-0770
debra.meachum@ssa.gov
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?