Kansas Wheat Alliance, Inc. et al v. Thunderbird Seed Conditioning LLC et al
Filing
73
ORDER granting 66 Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint and Add Parties. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the [66-1] Second Amended Complaint. Defendants shall respond to the Second Amended Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 and all applicable local and federal rules. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/17/2013. (mehcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01171-MEH
KANSAS WHEAT ALLIANCE, INC., and
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THUNDERBIRD SEED CONDITIONING, LLC,
THUNDERBIRD COMMODITIES, LLC, and
JOHN DOES 1-50,
Defendants.
ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
COMPLAINT AND ADD PARTIES
Plaintiffs have filed a Motion to Amend Complaint and Add Parties [filed September 13,
2013; docket #66]. The Motion was initially opposed, but on October 15, 2013, the Thunderbird
Defendants filed their Response in which they do not oppose the requested relief.
Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that, following a 21-day period for
service of the complaint or service of a responsive pleading or Rule 12 motion, a party may amend
its complaint only by leave of the court or by written consent of the adverse party. Fed. R. Civ. P.
15(a) (2011). Rule 15 instructs courts to “freely give leave when justice so requires.” Id.
Nevertheless, denying leave to amend is proper if the proposed amendments are unduly delayed,
unduly prejudicial, futile, or sought in bad faith. Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962); Frank
v. U.S. West, Inc., 3 F.3d 1357, 1365 (10th Cir. 1993).
Because Plaintiffs’ Motion is unopposed and has the written consent of the adverse party,
it is granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the Second Amended Complaint found at
docket #66-1. Defendants shall respond to the Second Amended Complaint in accordance with Fed.
R. Civ. P. 15 and all applicable local and federal rules.
Dated at Denver, Colorado this 17th day of October, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
Michael E. Hegarty
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?