Bargen v. Sapp Bros Travel Centers, Inc. et al

Filing 74

MINUTE ORDER granting 72 Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order, denying as moot 68 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order, and setting a Discovery deadline of 2/28/2013, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/29/13.(dkals, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01199-CMA-KLM
THOANCHELLE BARGEN,
Plaintiff,
v.
SAPP BROS TRAVEL CENTERS INC., a Nebraska Corporation,
SAPP BROS TRAVEL CENTERS INC. d/b/a APPLE BARREL RESTAURANT,
DIANA COLLINS, an individual,
ASHLEY M. BAILEY, an individual,
PAULA GAER, an individual,
ANTHONY SENA, an individual,
DOES I through X, inclusive, and
ROE ENTITIES I through X, inclusive,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Amend
Scheduling Order [Docket No. 72; Filed January 29, 2013] (the “Unopposed Motion”) and
Defendants’ Motion to Amend Scheduling Order [#68; Filed January 8, 2013] (the
“Motion”). The Unopposed Motion and the Motion request the same relief. The
Unopposed Motion, however, reflects that Plaintiff has no opposition while the Motion
reflects that Defendants were unable to confer with Plaintiff’s counsel before filing the
Motion.
Defendants explain that due to the rescheduling of an independent medical
evaluation, additional time is needed for Defendants’ rebuttal expert designation.
Additionally, to accommodate the scheduling of the deposition of Plaintiff’s expert,
Defendants request an extension of the discovery deadline.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion [#72] is GRANTED. The
Scheduling Order entered on September 18, 2012 [#51], and modified on October 23, 2012
[#58] and on November 27, 2012 [#62], is further modified to extend the following
deadlines:
•
•

Rebuttal Expert Designation Deadline
Discovery Cut-off

February 28, 2013
February 28, 2013

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion [#68] is DENIED AS MOOT.
Dated: January 29, 2013