Howard v. Stellar Recovery, Inc.

Filing 42

ORDER: 37 The Motion to Extend is DENIED; Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/21/13 is VACATED and RESET to 12/20/12 at 1:00 pm in Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties shall submit a proposed final pretrial order on or before December 18, 2012. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/12/12. (bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 12-cv-01207-RPM-BNB GORDON HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. STELLAR RECOVERY, INC., a Florida corporation, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on defendant’s Motion to Amend Scheduling Order and Extend Discovery Cutoff Date and Dispositive Motion Deadline [Doc. # 37, filed 11/29/2012] (the “Motion to Extend”). I held a hearing on the Motion to Extend this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. In general, I find that the defendant has failed to establish that despite reasonable diligence, it could not comply with the deadlines previously set. In addition, at the parties mutual request, I granted their oral motion to reset the final pretrial conference to an earlier date. IT IS ORDERED: (1) The Motion to Extend [Doc. # 37] is DENIED; and (2) The final pretrial conference, previously set for February 21, 2013, is VACATED and RESET to December 20, 2012, at 1:00 a.m., in Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties shall submit a proposed final pretrial order on or before December 18, 2012. Dated December 12, 2012. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?