Dicino v. Mink et al

Filing 83

MINUTE ORDER denying 75 Motion for Extension of Time To File Objections To Recommendation Of United States Magistrate Judge and denying as moot 76 Motion Requesting Court To Enter An Order Compelling Defendant Garcia To Serve Plaintiff With A Copy Of Her Objections To The Recommendation Of The United States Magistrate Judgefor Order. By Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 6/20/13.(mjgsl, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01274-WYD-KLM
MICHAEL DICINO,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALEXANDRA GARCIA, in her individual capacity,
Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY SENIOR JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL
THIS MATTER is before the Court on plaintiff, Michael Dicino’s, Motion For
Extension Of Time To File Objections To Recommendation Of United States Magistrate
Judge [ECF No. 75] and Motion Requesting Court Enter An Order Compelling
Defendant Garcia To Serve Plaintiff With A Copy Of Her Objections To The
Recommendation Of The United States Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 76]. After careful
consideration, it is
ORDERED that Dicino’s Motion For Extension Of Time To File Objections To
Recommendation Of United States Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 75] is DENIED because
Dicino failed to file objections within the 14 day period prescribed in Magistrate Judge
Mix’s Recommendation [ECF No. 58, p. 18] and failed to request an extension of time to
file objections within that time frame. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Dicino’s Motion Requesting Court To Enter An Order
Compelling Defendant Garcia To Serve Plaintiff With A Copy Of Her Objections To The
Recommendation Of The United States Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 76] is DENIED AS
MOOT because defendant, Alexandra Garcia, mailed a copy of her Objections To
Recommendation Of United States Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 61] to Dicino’s new
address on Thursday, May 30, 2013.
Dated: June 20, 2013.