Dawson et al v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP et al

Filing 46

Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 5/22/13. ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Opposed Motion to Compel Discovery 34 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is granted, and the objections a re overruled, regarding responses to interrogatories 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, and 4 and requests for production of documents 1, 2, 4, and 9. The motion is denied, and the objections are sustained, regarding responses to interrogatories 3, 5, 6, and 7, inclu ding all sub-parts, and requests for production of documents 5, 6, 7, and 8, as stated on record. ORDERED: Defendants shall supplement their discovery responses as ordered by June 5, 2013. ORDERED: Plaintiffs may file a supplement to their Motion for Extension of Time notifying the Court of additional documents received and requesting a revised date to respond to 37 Motion for Summary Judgment, as stated on record. ORDERED: Discovery deadline is revised to July 15, 2013. FTR: S. Grimm. (sgrim)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No:
Courtroom Deputy:

12-cv-01334-CMA-KMT
Sabrina Grimm

CLINTON J. DAWSON, and
JANELL DAWSON,

Date: May 22, 2013
FTR: Courtroom C-201
Blair Kenneth Drazic

Plaintiffs,
v.
LITTON LOAN SERVICING, LP, and
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,

Wayne Edwin Vaden

Defendants.

COURTROOM MINUTES

Hearing on Motion to Compel
1:13 p.m.

Court in session.

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
Discussion regarding Plaintiffs’ Opposed Motion to Compel Discovery [34] with respect to
interrogatories and requests for production, public impact, NPV (net present value), loan
modification, and loan ownership.
1:15 p.m.

Argument by Mr. Drazic.

1:55 p.m.

Argument by Mr. Vaden.

2:07 p.m.

Rebuttal argument by Mr. Drazic.

ORDERED: Plaintiffs’ Opposed Motion to Compel Discovery [34] is GRANTED IN
PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is granted, and the objections
are overruled, regarding responses to interrogatories 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, and 4 and
requests for production of documents 1, 2, 4, and 9. The motion is denied,
and the objections are sustained, regarding responses to interrogatories 3, 5,
6, and 7, including all sub-parts, and requests for production of documents 5,
6, 7, and 8, as stated on record.

Discussion regarding pending motions.
ORDERED: Defendants shall supplement their discovery responses as ordered by June 5,
2013.
ORDERED: Plaintiffs may file a supplement to their Motion for Extension of Time
notifying the Court of additional documents received and requesting a
revised date to respond to [37] Motion for Summary Judgment, as stated on
record.
ORDERED: Discovery deadline is revised to July 15, 2013.
2:32 p.m.

Court in recess.

Hearing concluded.
Total in-court time 01:19
*To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at [phone].

Page 2 of 2