Pesick v. Vitamin Cottage Natural Foods Market, Inc., et al.

Filing 28

ORDER The parties have filed a Joint Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice. After careful review of the stipulation and the file, the court has concluded that the stipulation should be approved and that Plaintiffs claims against Defendant should be dismissed with prejudice. THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED as follows: That the Joint Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice is APPROVED; and That Plaintiffs claims against the Defendant are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to pay his, her, or its own attorneys fees and costs, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/14/2013.(ervsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-01368-RPM-CBS (Consolidated with 12-cv-02611) MARY ROSE MUNIZ , Plaintiff, v. VITAMIN COTTAGE NATURAL FOODS MARKETS, INC., d/b/a Natural Grocers By Vitamin Cottage, Defendant. and DAVID MUNIZ, Plaintiff, v. VITAMIN COTTAGE NATURAL FOOD MARKETS, INC., d/b/a Natural Grocers By Vitamin Cottage Defendant. _________________________________________________________________________ ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE _________________________________________________________________________ The parties have filed a Joint Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice. After careful review of the stipulation and the file, the court has concluded that the stipulation should be approved and that Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant should be dismissed with prejudice. THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Joint Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice is APPROVED; and 2. That Plaintiffs’ claims against the Defendant are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to pay his, her, or its own attorney’s fees and costs. Dated this 14th day of June, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch _________________________________ Richard P. Matsch , Senior Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?