Ouedraogo v. Downtown Denver Business Improvement District
Filing
66
FINAL JUDGMENT. ORDERED that Plaintiff SOULEYMANE OUEDRAOGO recovers nothing, the action is dismissed on the merits, and Defendant DOWNTOWN DENVER BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT is AWARDED its costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1 by Clerk on 02/13/14. (jhawk, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01373-JLK
SOULEYMANE OUEDRAOGO,
Plaintiff,
v.
DOWNTOWN DENVER BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT,
Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT, DOC. 33, & DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
COMPLAINT, DOC. 36 of Judge John L. Kane entered on February 13, 2014 it is
ORDERED that Plaintiff SOULEYMANE OUEDRAOGO recovers nothing, the action is
dismissed on the merits, and Defendant DOWNTOWN DENVER BUSINESS
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT is AWARDED its costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the
Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.
Dated at Denver, Colorado this 13th day of February, 2014.
FOR THE COURT:
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK
By: s/
Bernique Abiakam
Bernique Abiakam
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?