Ouedraogo v. Downtown Denver Business Improvement District

Filing 66

FINAL JUDGMENT. ORDERED that Plaintiff SOULEYMANE OUEDRAOGO recovers nothing, the action is dismissed on the merits, and Defendant DOWNTOWN DENVER BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT is AWARDED its costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1 by Clerk on 02/13/14. (jhawk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-01373-JLK SOULEYMANE OUEDRAOGO, Plaintiff, v. DOWNTOWN DENVER BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, Defendant. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered. Pursuant to the ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DOC. 33, & DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT, DOC. 36 of Judge John L. Kane entered on February 13, 2014 it is ORDERED that Plaintiff SOULEYMANE OUEDRAOGO recovers nothing, the action is dismissed on the merits, and Defendant DOWNTOWN DENVER BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT is AWARDED its costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. Dated at Denver, Colorado this 13th day of February, 2014. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/ Bernique Abiakam Bernique Abiakam Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?