Griffin v. Hickenlooper et al

Filing 78

JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff Eldridge L. Griffin re: 77 Order Adopting Recommendation on Motion to Dismiss. Costs awarded to Defendants. Entered by Clerk on 06/06/13. (ebutl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez Civil Action No. 12-cv-01379-WJM-MJW ELDRIDGE L. GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. AMY COSNER, and BERNADETTE SCOTT, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a); all previous Orders entered in this case; and the Order Adopting May 14, 2013 Recommendation of Magistrate Judge And Granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, entered by the Honorable William J. Martínez, United States District Judge, on June 4, 2013, IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (ECF No. 76) is ADOPTED in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 46) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Final Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against the Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 14) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants are awarded costs pursuant to the Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1 upon the filing of a Bill of Costs with the Clerk of Court within fourteen days’ entry of Final Judgment. Dated at Denver, Colorado this 6th day of June, 2013. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/ Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?