Malibu Media, LLC v. John Does 1-33

Filing 37

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 27 Motion to Dismiss/Sever, and for a Protective Order and/or to Quash Subpoena by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 08/30/12.(jjhsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01394-WYD-MEH
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN DOES 1-2, 4-33,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on August 30, 2012.
Before the Court is Defendant John Doe 23's Motion to Dismiss/Sever, and for a Protective
Order and/or to Quash Subpoena [filed August 15, 2012; docket #27].
Due to its varied requests for relief, adjudication of the single motion will likely require
several different standards of review and legal analyses of both dispositive and non-dispositive
issues. In the interests of judicial efficiency and the proper management of its docket, the Court
denies the motion without prejudice and instructs the Defendant to file his requests for relief each
in separate motions, as applicable. See D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1C (“A motion shall be made in a
separate paper.”)
Further, the Court notes that Defendant failed to file with his motion to quash a copy of the
challenged subpoena. Therefore, if Defendant chooses to re-file his motion, he is instructed to file
a copy of the challenged subpoena with the motion.