Kim v. Falk et al
Filing
15
ORDER For State Court Record, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 08/24/12. (nmmsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01419-BNB
KIM YOOBANG,
Applicant,
v.
JAMES FALK, Warden of the Sterling Correctional Facility, and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO,
Respondents.
ORDER FOR STATE COURT RECORD
After preliminary consideration of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 2254, IT IS ORDERED:
(1)
Within thirty days from the date of this order Respondents shall file
with the Clerk of the Court, in electronic format if available, a copy of the complete
record of Applicant=s state court proceedings in Arapahoe County District Court case
number 2002CR2132, including all documents in the state court file and transcripts of
all proceedings conducted in the state court, but excluding any physical evidence (as
opposed to documentary evidence) not relevant to the asserted claims;
(2)
Within thirty days from the date the state court record is provided to
the Court, Respondents shall file an Answer conforming to the requirements of Rule 5
of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts; and
(3)
Within thirty days of the filing of the answer Applicant may file a reply, if
he desires; and
(4)
The Clerk of the Court is directed to send copies of this Order to the clerk
of the state court from which the case originated and to the Court Services Manager,
State Court Administrator=s Office by United States mail, first class postage prepaid, at
the following addresses:
Clerk of the Court
Arapahoe County District Court
7325 S. Potomac St.
Centennial, Colorado 80112;
Court Services Manager
State Court Administrator=s Office
101 W. Colfax, Suite 500
Denver, Colorado 80202
DATED at Denver, Colorado, on August 24, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/Craig B. Shaffer
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?