Rainey v. Huertas

Filing 112

MINUTE ORDER re: 110 Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification. The only request for relief the Court can liberally discern from the "motion" is a request by the Plaintiff that the Court "let the Plaintiff know when it receive [sic] this motion." To the extent this minute order satisfies Plaintiff's request, the motion is granted only as to such request. Otherwise, the motion is denied. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/27/12.(mnfsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01434-CMA-MEH
JOHN RAINEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
HECTOR T. HUERTAS,
TRAVIS TRANI,
DENNIS BURBANK, and
DR. HODGE,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on November 27, 2012.
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Motion for Clarification” [filed November 26, 2012; docket
#110]. Like most of Plaintiff’s filings, this “motion” is vague and prolix, and any request for relief
is difficult to comprehend. Moreover, the information contained in the “motion” is the same or
similar to that contained in other documents filed by the Plaintiff. The only request for relief the
Court can liberally discern from the “motion” is a request by the Plaintiff that the Court “let the
Plaintiff know when it receive [sic] this motion.” To the extent this minute order satisfies Plaintiff’s
request, the motion is granted only as to such request. Otherwise, the motion is denied.