Rainey v. Huertas

Filing 97

MINUTE ORDER denying 74 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and striking 75 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/22/12.(dkals, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01434-CMA-MEH
JOHN RAINEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
HECTOR T. HUERTAS,
TRAVIS TRANI,
DENNIS BURBANK, and
DR. HODGE,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on October 22, 2012.
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Response Motion for Preliminary Injunction to be Moved to
Another Facility [filed October 5, 2012; docket #74]. Although vague and somewhat unintelligible,
the motion appears to be a response brief to a pending motion the Plaintiff filed on September 19,
2012. Thus, it appears that the Plaintiff misunderstands the Court’s September 20, 2012 order
setting a briefing schedule and believes that he was required to file a response. That is not the case;
consequently, the Court can provide no relief under the circumstances and the motion is denied.
Further, pursuant to this Court’s September 28, 2012, Plaintiff’s third repetitive Motion for
Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction for Being Denied Due Process of Law
[filed October 5, 2012; docket #75] is stricken pursuant to D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1H. The relief
requested is the same as that requested in pending motions, and the Plaintiff fails to identify how any
information contained or relief requested in this motion is different than that contained or requested
in his pending motions.