Clark v. Yates et al
Filing
48
Order Regarding Joint Motion for Court Approval of Settlment. Ordered that the Release and Settlement Agreement between the parties is approved. Ordered that all claims against Defendant Officer John Yates, in his individual and official capacit ies, are dismissed with prejudice. Ordered that the case caption is amended to accurately reflect that the City of Aurora is the only Defendant involved in this case. Ordered that the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice of the Defendant City of Aurora is GRANTED. ORDERED that this matter is dismissed, all parties to pay their own costs and attorneys' fees by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 03/12/13. (jjhsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01480-RPM
MARY CLARK,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO; and
JOHN YATES, in his individual and official capacity as an Aurora Police Officer,
Defendants.
ORDER REGARDING JOINT MOTION FOR COURT APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT
THIS MATTER came before the Court on the parties Joint Motion for Court Approval of
Settlement and the Court, having reviewed the motion, and being fully advised of the premises,
hereby orders that the motion is GRANTED.
IT IS ORDERED that:
(1)
the Release and Settlement Agreement between the parties is approved;
(2)
all claims against Defendant Officer John Yates, in his individual and
official capacities, are dismissed with prejudice;
(3)
the case caption is amended to accurately reflect that the City of Aurora is
the only Defendant involved in this case; and
(4)
the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice of the Defendant City of
Aurora is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is dismissed, all parties to pay their own
costs and attorneys’ fees.
DONE this12 day of March, 2013.
BY THE COURT
s/Richard P. Matsch
Richard P. Matsch
United States District Court Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?