Wojdacz v. Colorado Springs City Police Department et al.

Filing 20

MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 10 Motion to Dismiss or Quash Service. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is accepted as filed. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/6/12.(mjgsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-01483-REB-MEH ELIZABETH WOJDACZ, Plaintiff, v. COLORADO SPRINGS CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, COMMANDER BRIAN GRADY, OFFICER JOHN IRELAND, PATRICK MILLER, PENROSE ST. FRANCIS HEALTHCARE, GARY LEE NORMAN, MICHAEL J. DUNCAN, and CLIFF HUDSON, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on August 6, 2012. Pending before the Court is the City Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or Quash Service [filed July 17, 2012 docket #10] filed by Defendants Commander Brian Grady, Officer John Ireland, and the Colorado Springs Police Department (self-described “City Defendants”). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B), Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint less than 21 days after service of the City Defendants’ motion under Rule 12(b). (Docket #19.) Therefore, Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is accepted as filed, and the City Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or Quash Service is denied as moot. See Franklin v. Kansas Dep’t of Corr., 160 F. App'x 730, 734 (10th Cir. 2005) (“An amended complaint supersedes the original complaint and renders the original complaint of no legal effect.”) (citing Miller v. Glanz, 948 F. 2d 1562, 1565 (10th Cir. 1991)).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?