Wojdacz v. Colorado Springs City Police Department et al.
Filing
51
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Telephonic Motion Hearing and Scheduling Conference held on 9/10/2012, deferring ruling on 35 Plaintiff's Opposed Motion for Trinity Hearing, deny ing 37 Plaintiff's Oppossed (sic) Motion to Produce Home Address of City Defendants, and denying 39 Plaintiff's Opposed Motion to Vacate Status Report Regarding Proposed Scheduling Order; Scheduling Order; and Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order Due to Fraud Upon the Court by Officers of the Court. Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures due by 9/24/2012. Joinder of Parties/Amendment of Pleadings due by 10/25/2012. Discovery due by 6/1/2013., Dispositive Motions due by 7/1/2013. Initial expert disclosures due by 4/1/2013. Rebuttal expert disclosures due by 5/1/2013. FTR: C. Coomes -- Courtroom A-501. (mehcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL E. HEGARTY
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01483-REB-MEH
Courtroom Deputy: Cathy Coomes
Date: September 11, 2012
FTR – Courtroom A501
ELIZABETH WOJDACZ,
Pro Se
Plaintiff,
vs.
COLORADO SPRING CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT,
BRIAN GRADY,
JOHN IRELAND,
PATRICK MILLER,
PENROSE ST. FRANCIS HEALTHCARE,
GARY LEE NORMAN,
MICHAEL J. DUNCAN, and
CLIFF HUDSON,
Erik Lamphere (by phone)
Michael Watts
Kimberly DeLine
Defendants.
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
TELEPHONIC MOTIONS HEARING and SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
Court in session:
2:05 p.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of pro se Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants.
Discussion regarding setting deadlines and entering the Scheduling Order submitted by
Defendants.
THE FOLLOWING WILL CONFIRM THE ACTIONS TAKEN AND DATES SET AT THE
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HELD THIS DATE:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures: September 24, 2012
Joinder of Parties/Amendment of Pleadings:
October 25, 2012
Discovery Deadline: June 1, 2013
Dispositive Motion Deadline:
July 1, 2013
Initial Rule 26(a)(2) Disclosures: April 1, 2013
Rebuttal Rule 26(a)(2) Disclosures:
May 1, 2013
•
•
Each party group will be allowed five (5) experts absent leave of court.
Plaintiff will be allowed 50 interrogatories, 50 Requests for Admissions, and 25 Requests
•
•
for Production of Documents.
Defendants will be allowed 50 interrogatories, 50 Requests for Admissions, and 25
Requests for Production of Documents.
Written discovery shall be served no later than 33 days prior to the close of discovery.
Discussion regarding Defendants recently served but have not entered an appearance.
Plaintiff is sworn and questioned by the Court.
ORDERED: 1.
2.
Plaintiff shall contact Ms. DeLine or Mr. Watts by telephone once a week
on Monday between 12:00 p.m. (noon) and 2:00 p.m. to discuss the status
of the case.
Plaintiff shall keep the Court and Defendants advised of any change of
addresses.
Argument and discussion regarding Plaintiff’s Oppossed (sic) Motion to Produce Home Address
of City Defendants (Doc. #37, filed 8/27/12); Plaintiff’s Opposed Motion to Vacate Status Report
Regarding Proposed Scheduling Order; Scheduling Order; and Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order
Due to Fraud Upon the Court by Officers of the Court (Doc. #39, filed 8/27/12); and Plaintiff’s
Opposed Motion for Trinity Hearing (Doc. #35, filed 8/27/12).
ORDERED: 1.
Plaintiff’s Oppossed (sic) Motion to Produce Home Address of City
Defendants (Doc. #37, filed 8/27/12) is DENIED as stated on the record.
2.
Plaintiff’s Opposed Motion to Vacate Status Report Regarding Proposed
Scheduling Order; Scheduling Order; and Courtroom Minutes/Minute
Order Due to Fraud Upon the Court by Officers of the Court (Doc. #39,
filed 8/27/12) is DENIED as stated on the record.
3.
The Court defers ruling on Plaintiff’s Opposed Motion for Trinity Hearing
(Doc. #35, filed 8/27/12) at this time to allow Mr. Lamphere time to file a
response to the motion.
Discussion regarding the pending Motion to Dismiss, the lack of a Certificate of Review, RICO
statutes, and Plaintiff’s claims.
Court in recess:
3:05 p.m. (Hearing concluded)
Total time in court: 1:00
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?