Lopez, et al., v. Well's Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.,
Filing
8
ORDER OF RECUSAL directing reassignment to another judge re: 7 Suggestion of Recusal. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 6/22/12.(mnfsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Christine M. Arguello
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01492-CMA-KMT
EMELDA MARIE LOPEZ, and
RAYMOND N. LOPEZ,
Plaintiffs,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
ARONOWITZ & MECKLENBERG, LLP,
SUSAN J. HENDRICK,
ORTIZ AND ASSOCIATES, INC., and
All Persons Claiming Any Legal Or Equitable Right, Title, Estate, Lien, Or Interest In
The Property Described In The Complaint Adverse To Plaintiffs’ Title, Or Any Cloud
On Plaintiffs’ Title Thereto, and
DOES 1 -100,
Defendants.
ORDER OF RECUSAL
By Notice of Disclosure (Doc. # 5), dated June 13, 2012, the undersigned notified
the parties in this matter of her various business associations with Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A. On June 22, 2012, Plaintiffs timely filed their request for the undersigned to recuse
herself based on said Notice of Disclosure (see Doc. # 7).
Based on Plaintiffs’ concerns, and Judge Arguello’s business relationships with
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Judge Arguello believes that she should recuse herself. It is,
therefore,
ORDERED that the judge’s file be returned to the clerk and that this case be
reassigned by random draw.
DATED: June
22
, 2012
BY THE COURT:
_______________________________
CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?