Lopez, et al., v. Well's Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.,

Filing 8

ORDER OF RECUSAL directing reassignment to another judge re: 7 Suggestion of Recusal. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 6/22/12.(mnfsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Christine M. Arguello Civil Action No. 12-cv-01492-CMA-KMT EMELDA MARIE LOPEZ, and RAYMOND N. LOPEZ, Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., ARONOWITZ & MECKLENBERG, LLP, SUSAN J. HENDRICK, ORTIZ AND ASSOCIATES, INC., and All Persons Claiming Any Legal Or Equitable Right, Title, Estate, Lien, Or Interest In The Property Described In The Complaint Adverse To Plaintiffs’ Title, Or Any Cloud On Plaintiffs’ Title Thereto, and DOES 1 -100, Defendants. ORDER OF RECUSAL By Notice of Disclosure (Doc. # 5), dated June 13, 2012, the undersigned notified the parties in this matter of her various business associations with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. On June 22, 2012, Plaintiffs timely filed their request for the undersigned to recuse herself based on said Notice of Disclosure (see Doc. # 7). Based on Plaintiffs’ concerns, and Judge Arguello’s business relationships with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Judge Arguello believes that she should recuse herself. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the judge’s file be returned to the clerk and that this case be reassigned by random draw. DATED: June 22 , 2012 BY THE COURT: _______________________________ CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?