Dahl v. Astrue
Filing
13
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 10/22/2012. SS Defendants Brief due by 11/21/2012. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 12/6/2012, by Judge John L. Kane on 9/10/12. (sgrim)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01552-AP
PATRICIA DAHL,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
______________________________________________________________________
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
For Defendant:
JOSEPH A. WHITCOMB
Rocky Mountain Disability Group
1391 Speer Blvd, Suite 705
Denver, CO 80204
Telephone: (303) 534-1958
Facsimile: (303) 534-1949
joe@rmdlg.com
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
District of Colorado
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
M. THAYNE WARNER
Social Security Administration-Denver
1001 17th Street
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: (303) 844-7237
Facsimile: (303) 844-0770
Thayne.warner@ssa.gov
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42
U.S.C. 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.
C.
Date Complaint Was Filed: June 15, 2012
Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: June 20, 2012
Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: August 20, 2012
4.
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
At this time, the Administrative Record appears to be complete and accurate; the parties will
fully ascertain the completeness of the record upon the drafting and completion of their
respective briefs.
5.
STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS
OR DEFENSES
The parties do not foresee offering any unusual claims or defenses in this case.
7. OTHER MATTERS
The parties are not aware of any other matters at this time.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Counsel for both parties agree to the following proposed briefing schedule:
A.
B.
C.
Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: October 22, 2012
Defendant's Response Brief Due: November 21, 2012
Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: December 6, 2012
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
Plaintiff's Statement:
Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B.
Defendant's Statement:
Defendant does not request oral argument.
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A.
( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge.
B.
(X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United
States Magistrate Judge.
11. OTHER MATTERS
The parties filing motions for extension of time or continuances must comply with
D.C.Colo.LCivR 7.1(c) by submitting proof that a copy of the motion has been served upon the
moving attorney's client, all attorneys of record, and all pro se parties.
12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended
only upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 10th day of September, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
S/John L. Kane________
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
For Plaintiff:
s/ Joseph A. Whitcomb
JOSEPH A. WHITCOMB
Rocky Mountain Disability Group
1391 Speer Blvd, Suite 705
Denver, CO 80204
Telephone: (303) 534-1958
Facsimile: (303) 534-1949
joe@rmdlg.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
For Defendant:
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
District of Colorado
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
s/ M. Thayne Warner
M. THAYNE WARNER
Social Security AdministrationDenver
Office of General Counsel
1001 17th Street
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: (303) 844-7237
Facsimile: (303) 454-0770
thayne.warner@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?