Dahl v. Astrue

Filing 13

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 10/22/2012. SS Defendants Brief due by 11/21/2012. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 12/6/2012, by Judge John L. Kane on 9/10/12. (sgrim)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-01552-AP PATRICIA DAHL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________ JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES ______________________________________________________________________ 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: For Defendant: JOSEPH A. WHITCOMB Rocky Mountain Disability Group 1391 Speer Blvd, Suite 705 Denver, CO 80204 Telephone: (303) 534-1958 Facsimile: (303) 534-1949 joe@rmdlg.com JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney District of Colorado WILLIAM G. PHARO Assistant United States Attorney M. THAYNE WARNER Social Security Administration-Denver 1001 17th Street Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: (303) 844-7237 Facsimile: (303) 844-0770 Thayne.warner@ssa.gov 2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. B. C. Date Complaint Was Filed: June 15, 2012 Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: June 20, 2012 Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: August 20, 2012 4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD At this time, the Administrative Record appears to be complete and accurate; the parties will fully ascertain the completeness of the record upon the drafting and completion of their respective briefs. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES The parties do not foresee offering any unusual claims or defenses in this case. 7. OTHER MATTERS The parties are not aware of any other matters at this time. 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE Counsel for both parties agree to the following proposed briefing schedule: A. B. C. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: October 22, 2012 Defendant's Response Brief Due: November 21, 2012 Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: December 6, 2012 9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument. B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument. 10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE A. ( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. B. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. 11. OTHER MATTERS The parties filing motions for extension of time or continuances must comply with D.C.Colo.LCivR 7.1(c) by submitting proof that a copy of the motion has been served upon the moving attorney's client, all attorneys of record, and all pro se parties. 12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED this 10th day of September, 2012. BY THE COURT: S/John L. Kane________ U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE APPROVED: For Plaintiff: s/ Joseph A. Whitcomb JOSEPH A. WHITCOMB Rocky Mountain Disability Group 1391 Speer Blvd, Suite 705 Denver, CO 80204 Telephone: (303) 534-1958 Facsimile: (303) 534-1949 joe@rmdlg.com Attorney for Plaintiff For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney District of Colorado WILLIAM G. PHARO Assistant United States Attorney s/ M. Thayne Warner M. THAYNE WARNER Social Security AdministrationDenver Office of General Counsel 1001 17th Street Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: (303) 844-7237 Facsimile: (303) 454-0770 thayne.warner@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?