Bacote et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al

Filing 201

ORDER Granting 200 Motion for Protective Order: counsel for the plaintiff shall file a disclosure statement pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 5/21/2014.(jsmit)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-01570-RPM HAROLD CUNNINGHAM, CARLTON DUNBAR, JOHN W. NARDUCCI, JR., JEREMY PINSON, JOHN J. POWERS, ERNEST NORMAN SHAIFER, and MARCELLUS WASHINGTON, Each individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and CENTER FOR LEGAL ADVOCACY D.B.A. THE LEGAL CENTER FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES AND OLDER PEOPLE, COLORADO’S PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY SYSTEM, Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. ___________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER ___________________________________________________________________________ This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order, which seeks an order that Defendant is not required to respond to any pro se discovery requests by Plaintiff Jeremy Pinson, including the pending set of requests dated April 18, 2014. For the same reasons that the Court has granted a partial stay of the proceedings in this case, the Court finds that the motion for protective order should be GRANTED. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant is not required to respond to any pro se discovery requests by Plaintiff Jeremy Pinson, including the pending set of requests dated April 18, 2014. DATED this 21st day of May, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch _________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?