Bacote et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
Filing
330
ORDER Granting 329 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Modify Deadlines in the Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 7/1/2016. Dispositive Motions due by 8/1/2016, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/22/15. (ktera)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01570-RPM
HAROLD CUNNINGHAM,
PERCY BARRON,
ALPHONSO BLAKE,
JABBAR CURRENCE,
CARLTON DUNBAR,
SCOTT FOUNTAIN,
SEAN GILLESPIE,
CHARLES HIPPS,
RONNIE HOUSTON,
JOHN LAMB,
HERBERT PERKINS,
JOHN J. POWERS,
ARNELL SHELTON, and
MARCELLUS WASHINGTON,
Each individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
and
CENTER FOR LEGAL ADVOCACY,
D.B.A. DISABILITY LAW COLORADO,
Plaintiffs,
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Defendant.
___________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO MODIFY
DEADLINES IN THE SCHEDULING ORDER
___________________________________________________________________________
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Modify
Deadlines in the Scheduling Order. The Court finds that the motion should be granted.
Accordingly, the deadlines in the Scheduling Order are hereby modified as follows:
Expert reports and Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures for the party bearing the burden of
persuasion on the issues for which the opinions are offered: April 1, 2016
Contradicting expert reports and Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures: May 2, 2016
Any rebuttal opinions: June 1, 2016
Fact and Expert Discovery Cutoff: July 1, 2016
Dispositive Motions: August 1, 2016
Oppositions to Dispositive Motions: August 31, 2016
Replies to Oppositions to Dispositive Motions: September 20, 2016
DATED this 22nd day of December, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
_________________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?