Bacote et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al

Filing 330

ORDER Granting 329 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Modify Deadlines in the Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 7/1/2016. Dispositive Motions due by 8/1/2016, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/22/15. (ktera)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-01570-RPM HAROLD CUNNINGHAM, PERCY BARRON, ALPHONSO BLAKE, JABBAR CURRENCE, CARLTON DUNBAR, SCOTT FOUNTAIN, SEAN GILLESPIE, CHARLES HIPPS, RONNIE HOUSTON, JOHN LAMB, HERBERT PERKINS, JOHN J. POWERS, ARNELL SHELTON, and MARCELLUS WASHINGTON, Each individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and CENTER FOR LEGAL ADVOCACY, D.B.A. DISABILITY LAW COLORADO, Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. ___________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO MODIFY DEADLINES IN THE SCHEDULING ORDER ___________________________________________________________________________ This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Modify Deadlines in the Scheduling Order. The Court finds that the motion should be granted. Accordingly, the deadlines in the Scheduling Order are hereby modified as follows: Expert reports and Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures for the party bearing the burden of persuasion on the issues for which the opinions are offered: April 1, 2016 Contradicting expert reports and Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures: May 2, 2016 Any rebuttal opinions: June 1, 2016 Fact and Expert Discovery Cutoff: July 1, 2016 Dispositive Motions: August 1, 2016 Oppositions to Dispositive Motions: August 31, 2016 Replies to Oppositions to Dispositive Motions: September 20, 2016 DATED this 22nd day of December, 2015. BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch _________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?