Bacote et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al

Filing 40

ORDER Amending Case Caption re 38 : The names of former Plaintiff Michael Bacote and former Defendant Newton E. Kendig shall be removed from the case caption, and the caption shall be amended to reflect the correct spelling of Defendant David Berkebile's last name, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/26/2012. (rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01570-RPM HAROLD CUNNINGHAM, JOHN W. NARDUCCI, JR., JEREMY PINSON, and ERNEST NORMAN SHAIFER, Each individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. NEWTON E. KENDIG, PAUL M. LAIRD, BLAKE R. DAVIS, and DAVID A. BERKEBILE, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER AMENDING THE CASE CAPTION ______________________________________________________________________________ Upon consideration of the unopposed motion of Plaintiffs Harold Cunningham, John W. Narducci, Jr., Jeremy Pinson, and Ernest Norman Shaifer (collectively “Plaintiffs”) to amend the caption of this case to remove the names of former Plaintiff Michael Bacote and former Defendant Newton E. Kendig, and to correct the inadvertent misspelling of the last name of defendant David Berkebile, and finding good cause therefore, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The names of former Plaintiff Michael Bacote and former Defendant Newton E. Kendig shall be removed from the case caption, and the caption shall be amended to reflect the correct spelling of Defendant David Berkebile’s last name. DATED: November 26, 2012 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch ____________________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?