Bacote et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
ORDER Granting 41 Motion to Withdraw [37-2] : The version of the Aro Declaration originally filled as an attachment to Plaintiffs' Response shall be removed from the public file in this case and replaced with the revised version [47-1], by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/7/2012.(rpmcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01570
JOHN W. NARDUCCI, JR.,
JEREMY PINSON, and
ERNEST NORMAN SHAIFER,
Each individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
NEWTON E. KENDIG, PAUL M. LAIRD,
BLAKE R. DAVIS, and
DAVID A. BERKEBILE
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO
WITHDRAWAND RESUBMIT A REVISED VERSION OF THE DECLARATION OF
EDWIN P. ARO IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
Upon consideration of the unopposed motion of Plaintiffs Harold Cunningham, John W.
Narducci, Jr., Jeremy Pinson, and Ernest Norman Shaifer (collectively “Plaintiffs”) to withdraw
the Declaration of Edwin P. Aro (the “Aro Declaration”) submitted as an attachment to
Plaintiffs’ Response to Motion to Dismiss [DOCUMENT NO. 37] (“Plaintiffs’ Response”), and
replace that declaration with an amended version, and finding good cause therefore, it is
ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The version of the Aro Declaration originally filled
as an attachment to Plaintiffs’ Response shall be removed from the public file in this case and
replaced with the revised version of the Aro Declaration submitted with Plaintiff’s Motion.
DATED: December 7th, 2012
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
Richard P. Matsch
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?