Bacote et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
Filing
77
ORDER Granting 76 Motion for Leave to Depose Incarcerated Witness Richie Antonio Hill, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/22/2013 (12-cv-01144-RPM and 12-cv-01570-RPM).(rpmcd )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01570-RPM
HAROLD CUNNINGHAM, CARLTON DUNBAR,
JOHN W. NARDUCCI, JR., JEREMY PINSON,
ERNEST NORMAL SHAIFER, and MARCELLUS WASHINGTON,
Each individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
and
CENTER FOR LEGAL ADVOCACY D.B.A. THE LEGAL
CENTER FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES AND OLDER
PEOPLE, COLORADO’S PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY SYSTEM,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Defendant.
AND
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01144-RPM
RAYMOND VEGA, Personally and as Personal Representative
of the Estate of Jose Martin Vega, deceased,
Plaintiff,
vs.
BLAKE R. DAVIS, and certain additional unknown agents
of the United States Bureau of Prisons,
Defendants.
_________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DEPOSE INCARCERATED
WITNESS RICHIE ANTONIO HILL
_________________________________________________________________________________
The Court, having reviewed Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion Pursuant to Rule 30(a)(2)(B)
for Leave to Depose Incarcerated Witness Richie Antonio Hill (BOP Register No. 20689-018),
and finding good cause to grant such motion, hereby ORDERS as follows:
Plaintiffs in both of the above captioned actions are granted leave to take the deposition
of RICHIE ANTONIO HILL (BOP Register No. 20689-018) at the United States Medical Center
for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri, beginning on July 31, 2013, and continuing
thereafter until completed.
DATED: July 22nd, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
______________________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?