Bacote et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al

Filing 77

ORDER Granting 76 Motion for Leave to Depose Incarcerated Witness Richie Antonio Hill, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/22/2013 (12-cv-01144-RPM and 12-cv-01570-RPM).(rpmcd )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-01570-RPM HAROLD CUNNINGHAM, CARLTON DUNBAR, JOHN W. NARDUCCI, JR., JEREMY PINSON, ERNEST NORMAL SHAIFER, and MARCELLUS WASHINGTON, Each individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and CENTER FOR LEGAL ADVOCACY D.B.A. THE LEGAL CENTER FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES AND OLDER PEOPLE, COLORADO’S PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY SYSTEM, Plaintiffs, vs. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. AND Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01144-RPM RAYMOND VEGA, Personally and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jose Martin Vega, deceased, Plaintiff, vs. BLAKE R. DAVIS, and certain additional unknown agents of the United States Bureau of Prisons, Defendants. _________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DEPOSE INCARCERATED WITNESS RICHIE ANTONIO HILL _________________________________________________________________________________ The Court, having reviewed Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion Pursuant to Rule 30(a)(2)(B) for Leave to Depose Incarcerated Witness Richie Antonio Hill (BOP Register No. 20689-018), and finding good cause to grant such motion, hereby ORDERS as follows: Plaintiffs in both of the above captioned actions are granted leave to take the deposition of RICHIE ANTONIO HILL (BOP Register No. 20689-018) at the United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri, beginning on July 31, 2013, and continuing thereafter until completed. DATED: July 22nd, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch ______________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?