Williams v. Klein, et al
Filing
61
ORDER denying 59 Defendant Klein's Motion to Stay Discovery. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/24/2014.(klyon, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01580-REB-BNB
KEVIN RAYNELL WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAPTAIN KLIEN, Individually and in his official capacity as captain,
C.O. J. SANDER, Individually and in his official capacity as correctional officer,
C.O. DOCKINS, Individually and in his official capacity as correctional officer,
C.O. ROYAL, Individually and in his official capacity as correctional officer,
C.O. PRICE, Individually and in his official capacity as correctional officer, and
C.O. KOCH, Individually and in his official capacity as correctional officer,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises on Defendant Klein’s Motion to Stay Discovery [Doc. #59, filed
01/10/2014] (the “Motion”), which is DENIED.
The defendants seek to stay discovery pending the district judge’s ruling on my
recommendation to grant in part and deny in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss. After
consideration of the analysis set forth in Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Renda, 1987 WL 348635
*2 (D. Kan. Aug. 6, 1987), and String Cheese Incident, LLC v. Stylus Shows, Inc., 2006 WL
894955 *3 (D. Colo. March 30, 2006), I find that a stay is not warranted.
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Klein’s Motion to Stay Discovery [Doc. #59] is
DENIED.
Dated January 24, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?