Williams v. Klein, et al

Filing 61

ORDER denying 59 Defendant Klein's Motion to Stay Discovery. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/24/2014.(klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 12-cv-01580-REB-BNB KEVIN RAYNELL WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. CAPTAIN KLIEN, Individually and in his official capacity as captain, C.O. J. SANDER, Individually and in his official capacity as correctional officer, C.O. DOCKINS, Individually and in his official capacity as correctional officer, C.O. ROYAL, Individually and in his official capacity as correctional officer, C.O. PRICE, Individually and in his official capacity as correctional officer, and C.O. KOCH, Individually and in his official capacity as correctional officer, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on Defendant Klein’s Motion to Stay Discovery [Doc. #59, filed 01/10/2014] (the “Motion”), which is DENIED. The defendants seek to stay discovery pending the district judge’s ruling on my recommendation to grant in part and deny in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss. After consideration of the analysis set forth in Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Renda, 1987 WL 348635 *2 (D. Kan. Aug. 6, 1987), and String Cheese Incident, LLC v. Stylus Shows, Inc., 2006 WL 894955 *3 (D. Colo. March 30, 2006), I find that a stay is not warranted. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Klein’s Motion to Stay Discovery [Doc. #59] is DENIED. Dated January 24, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?