Buccaneer Energy (USA) Inc. v. Gunnison Energy Corporation et al
Filing
125
ORDER Deferring ruling on 120 Motion to Exclude; deferring ruling on 121 Motion to Exclude; deferring ruling on 122 Motion in Limine; deferring ruling on 123 Motion to Exclude. The subject of these motions will not be considered until after the oral argument on August 26, 2015. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that these motions will not be considered before oral argument on August 26,2015, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/7/2015.(evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01618-RPM
BUCCANEER ENERGY (USA) INC., a Nevada corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
GUNNISON ENERGY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,
SG INTERESTS I, LTD., a Texas limited partnership, and
SG INTERESTS VII, LTD., a Texas limited partnership,
Defendants.
ORDER DEFERRING RULING ON NEW MOTIONS
The defendants’ second motions for summary judgment have been fully briefed as of
April 30, 2015. Oral argument will be heard on August 26, 2015. On July 2, 2015, the
defendants filed a Joint Motion to Exclude the Rebuttal Opinions of Stephen A. Duree (Doc.
120) and a Joint Motion to Exclude the Opinions of William W. Koch (Doc. 121) and the
defendant Gunnison Energy Corporation filed a Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony
of Letha Lencioni (doc. 122) and a Motion to Exclude Expert Report and Testimony of
Michael J. Harris and Mark J. Dwyer (doc. 123).
-1-
These motions are not timely in relation to the pending summary judgment motions and
the plaintiff is not required to respond to them before the oral argument. The subject of these
motions will not be considered until after the oral argument on August 26, 2015.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that these motions will not be considered before oral argument on August 26,
2015.
Date: July 7, 2015
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
__________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?