Buccaneer Energy (USA) Inc. v. Gunnison Energy Corporation et al

Filing 125

ORDER Deferring ruling on 120 Motion to Exclude; deferring ruling on 121 Motion to Exclude; deferring ruling on 122 Motion in Limine; deferring ruling on 123 Motion to Exclude. The subject of these motions will not be considered until after the oral argument on August 26, 2015. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that these motions will not be considered before oral argument on August 26,2015, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/7/2015.(evana, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 12-cv-01618-RPM BUCCANEER ENERGY (USA) INC., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. GUNNISON ENERGY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, SG INTERESTS I, LTD., a Texas limited partnership, and SG INTERESTS VII, LTD., a Texas limited partnership, Defendants. ORDER DEFERRING RULING ON NEW MOTIONS The defendants’ second motions for summary judgment have been fully briefed as of April 30, 2015. Oral argument will be heard on August 26, 2015. On July 2, 2015, the defendants filed a Joint Motion to Exclude the Rebuttal Opinions of Stephen A. Duree (Doc. 120) and a Joint Motion to Exclude the Opinions of William W. Koch (Doc. 121) and the defendant Gunnison Energy Corporation filed a Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Letha Lencioni (doc. 122) and a Motion to Exclude Expert Report and Testimony of Michael J. Harris and Mark J. Dwyer (doc. 123). -1- These motions are not timely in relation to the pending summary judgment motions and the plaintiff is not required to respond to them before the oral argument. The subject of these motions will not be considered until after the oral argument on August 26, 2015. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that these motions will not be considered before oral argument on August 26, 2015. Date: July 7, 2015 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch __________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?