Buccaneer Energy (USA) Inc. v. Gunnison Energy Corporation et al
Filing
74
Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 7/25/2014 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Plaintiffs Motion to Compel 68 , is held in abeyance and counsel shall withdraw motion if issue is resolved. FTR: K. Terasaki. (jsmit)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Date:
July 25, 2014
Courtroom Deputy:
J. Chris Smith
FTR Technician:
Kathy Terasaki
____________________________________________________________________________________
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01618-RPM
BUCCANEER ENERGY (USA) INC., a Nevada corporation,
Plaintiff,
Ronald L. Wilcox
Stephen C. Peters
William A Cohan
v.
GUNNISON ENERGY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,
SG INTERESTS I, LTD, a Texas limited partnership, and
SG INTERESTS VII, LTD. a Texas limited partnership
Timothy R. Beyer
Peter J. Korneffel, Jr.
Mark S. Barron
Defendants.
____________________________________________________________________________________
COURTROOM MINUTES
____________________________________________________________________________________
Hearing on Motions to Compel
10:24 a.m.
Court in session.
Court’s preliminary remarks and states its understanding of the dispute with respect to the pending motion
to compel.
In response to Court’s inquiry, counsel state both state interstate and intrastate lines are unregulated with
respect to rate regulations.
Argument by Mr. Wilcox.
Argument by Mr. Korneffel.
Statements by Mr. Wilcox regarding damages.
Court instructs plaintiff to confer with its experts to narrow and clarify its discovery requests, then
resubmit them to defendant.
ORDERED:
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel [68], is held in abeyance and counsel shall withdraw
motion if issue is resolved.
10:50 a.m.
Court in recess.
Hearing concluded. Total time: 26 min.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?