Patrick Collins, Inc. v. John Does 1-32
Filing
21
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 16 Defendant Doe #13's Special Appearance Motion to Dismiss Party, Motion to Quash Subpoena, Motion for Protective Order, Motion to Sever for Improper Joinder; and Defendant Doe #13's 18 Amended Special Appearance Motion to Dismiss Party, Motion to Quash Subpoena, Motion for Protective Order, Motion to Sever for Improper Joinder. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/14/2012. (mehcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01642-CMA-MEH
PATRICK COLLINS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN DOES 1-32,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on August 14, 2012.
Defendant Doe #13's Special Appearance Motion to Dismiss Party, Motion to Quash
Subpoena, Motion for Protective Order, Motion to Sever for Improper Joinder [filed August 10,
2012; docket #16] and Defendant Doe #13's Amended1 Special Appearance Motion to Dismiss
Party, Motion to Quash Subpoena, Motion for Protective Order, Motion to Sever for Improper
Joinder [filed August 13, 2012; docket #18] are denied without prejudice for failure to seek
permission from the Court to proceed anonymously. See K-Beech, Inc. v. Does 1-29, 826 F. Supp.
2d 903, 905 (W.D.N.C. 2011) (noting that a party who wishes to proceed anonymously may
overcome the presumption against anonymous proceedings by filing a well-reasoned motion to
proceed anonymously); see also West Coast Prods., Inc. v. Does 1-5829, 275 F.R.D. 9, 12 (D.D.C.
2011) (“federal courts generally allow parties to proceed anonymously only under certain special
circumstances when anonymity is necessary to protect a person from harassment, injury, ridicule or
personal embarrassment”). If the Defendant John Doe cited herein wishes to re-file his motion in
accordance with this order and all applicable local and federal court rules, he may do so on or
before September 4, 2012 and must first (or contemporaneously) file a motion to proceed
anonymously. The Court warns the parties that it may strike any motion or other filing that deviates
from the requirements of this order or from those set forth in the applicable local or federal rules.
1
The Court notes that the “amended” motion appears to be identical to the original motion
and Doe 13 fails to identify what purportedly has been amended in the new motion.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?