Andalam v. The Trizetto Group

Filing 54

MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 52 Plaintiff's Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings or, in the Alternative, Joint Motion to Extend Discovery, Dispositive Motion and Pretrial Conference Deadlines. Denied as to staying of th is case. Discovery due by 8/2/2013. Dispositive Motions due by 9/4/2013. Final Pretrial Conference 8/13/2013 10:00 AM is vacated. Final Pretrial Conference reset for 11/4/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. Scheduling Order 20 is amended. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 6/27/2013.(mjwcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-01679-WYD-MJW VIJAYKRISHNA ANDALAM, Plaintiff, v. THE TRIZETTO GROUP, a Delaware corporation doing business as a foreign corporation in Colorado, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings or, in the Alternative, Joint Motion to Extend Discovery, Dispositive Motion and Pretrial Conference Deadlines (docket no. 52) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is DENIED as to staying of this case. The motion is GRANTED as to extending the deadlines to complete discovery, to file dispositive motion and resetting of the Pretrial Conference. The deadline to complete discovery is extended to August 2, 2013. The deadline to file dispositive motions is extended to September 4, 2013. The Final Pretrial Conference currently set on August 13, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED and RESET to November 4, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. The parties shall file their proposed Final Pretrial Order with the court seven (7) days prior to the Final Pretrial Conference. The Rule 16 Scheduling Order (docket no. 20) is amended consistent with this minute order. Date: June 27, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?