Stroeder v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 30

MINUTE ORDER Denying Without Prejudice 28 Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Rule 26 Disclosures Late, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 9/28/2012.(ervsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01743-WJM-KLM
TERRI LYNN STROEDER,
Plaintiff,
v.
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., and
CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Rule 26
Disclosures Late [Docket No. 28; Filed September 27, 2012] (the “Motion”). The Motion
fails to comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A, which provides as follows:
The Court will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before
filing the motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good faith efforts to
confer with opposing counsel or a pro se party to resolve the disputed matter.
The moving party shall state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the
motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule.
The Motion contains nothing to indicate that Plaintiff conferred or attempted to confer
with opposing counsel to resolve the matter and inquire whether Defendants oppose the
Motion. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#28] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Dated: September 28, 2012