Hernandez v. Astrue

Filing 14

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 2/5/2013. SS Defendants Brief due by 3/7/2013. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 3/22/2013, by Judge John L. Kane on 12/12/12. (sgrim)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-01783-AP RUBEN JESSIE HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: Michael W. Seckar, Esq. 402 W. 12th Street Pueblo, Colorado 81003 719-543-8636 seckarlaw@mindspring.com For Defendant: John F. Walsh United States Attorney J.B. García Assistant United States Attorney District of Colorado DAVID BLOWER Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1001 Seventeenth Street, 6th Floor Denver, Colorado 80202 (303) 844-1571 David.blower@ssa.gov 2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 7/10/12. B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 9/17/12. C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 11/19/12. 4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD To the best of their knowledge, the parties state that the administrative record is complete and accurate. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE Neither party intends to submit additional evidence. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES To the best of their knowledge, the parties do not believe the case raises unusual claims or defenses. 7. OTHER MATTERS The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the court. 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE The parties respectfully request the following briefing schedule, which is outside the standard 40 days due to Plaintiff’s counsel’s workload in December 2012 and January 2013: A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: 2/5/13. B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: 3/7/13. C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 3/22/13. 2 9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. B. 10. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE A. ( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. B. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. 11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED this 12th day of December, 2012. BY THE COURT: s/John L. Kane__________ U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 3 APPROVED: For Plaintiff: For Defendant: s/Michael W. Seckar Michael W. Seckar, Esq. 402 W. 12th Street Pueblo, Colorado 81003 719-543-8636 seckarlaw@mindspring.com JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney J.B. GARCIA Assistant United States Attorney District of Colorado s/David Blower By: David Blower Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1001 Seventeenth Street, 6th Floor Denver, Colorado 80202 (303) 844-1571 david.blower@ssa.gov 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?