Quintero v. Astrue
Filing
29
ORDER re: 27 USCA Order/Opinion/Judgment, 28 USCA Mandate, Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Final Judgment ECF No. 19 is hereby VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings in accordance with the Tenth Circuits decision. The Clerk shall enter judgment against the Commissioner and in favor of Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall have her costs, by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/5/2014. (evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 12-cv-1849-WJM
CYNTHIA QUINTERO,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration,
Defendant.
ORDER VACATING ORDER AFFIRMING ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE’S
DECISION, REMANDING TO THE COMMISSIONER, AND
DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
This matter is before the Court on the Mandate issued by the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. (ECF No. 27.) On August 2, 2013, this Court affirmed
the Commissioner’s decision denying Plaintiff Cynthia Quintero’s (“Plaintiff”) application
for Social Security disability and supplemental security income benefits. (ECF No. 18.)
On the same day, Final Judgment was entered in favor of the Commissioner and
against Plaintiff. (ECF No. 19.)
On June 5, 2014, after reviewing Plaintiff’s appeal, the Tenth Circuit issued an
Order and Judgment remanding the matter to this Court with instructions to remand to
the Commissioner for further proceedings. (ECF No. 27.) The Mandate was issued on
July 28, 2014. (ECF No. 28.)
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Final Judgment (ECF No. 19) is hereby
VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings
in accordance with the Tenth Circuit’s decision. The Clerk shall enter judgment against
the Commissioner and in favor of Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall have her costs.
Dated this 5th day of August, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?