Dean v. Astrue

Filing 11

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 11/28/2012. SS Defendants Brief due by 1/4/2013. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 1/18/2013, by Judge John L. Kane on 10/19/12. (sgrim)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-cv-01851-AP
DOROTHY M. DEAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:
KENNETH J. SHAKESHAFT
Shakeshaft Law Firm
1530 S. Tejon St.
Colorado Springs, CO 80905
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
For Defendant:
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney

1

J. BENEDICT GARCIA
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
District of Colorado
DANIEL E. BURROWS
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration , Region VIII
Office of General Counsel
1001 Seventeenth Street
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]

2.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
405(g).
3.

DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.

B.

Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 08/02/12

C.

4.

Date Complaint Was Filed:

07/17/12

Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 10/01/12

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is
complete and accurate.
5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.

2

6.

STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL
CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe the case raises unusual
claims or defenses.
7.

OTHER MATTERS

The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the court.
8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.

11/28/12

B.

Defendant's Response Brief Due:

01/04/13

C.
9.

Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due:

Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due:

01/18/13

STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement:
B. Defendant's Statement:
10.

Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
Defendant does not request oral argument.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

A. ( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge.
B. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge.
11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES
MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY
OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY’S CLIENT, ALL
ATTORNEYS OF RECORD AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or
amended only upon a showing of good cause.

3

DATED this 19th day of October, 2012 .

BY THE COURT

s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED:

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

s/ Kenneth J. Shakeshaft
KENNETH J. SHAKESHAFT
Shakeshaft Law Firm
1530 S. Tejon St.
Colorado Springs, CO 80905
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff

s/ Daniel E. Burrows
BY: DANIEL E. BURROWS
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1001 17th Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Defendant

4