Online Tools For Parents, LLC v. Vilsack et al
Filing
73
MINUTE ENTRY/RECOMMENDATION PURSUANT TO RULE 72(B) for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Motion Hearing/Scheduling Conference held on 2/26/2013. The court DENIES 67 Motion to Stay. Discovery due by 11/26/2013. Dispositi ve Motions due by 1/7/2014. The court stated, from the bench, its findings and legal basis for its recommendation. As stated on the record, the court hereby recommends that the 51 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Amended Complaint be DENIED. FTR: Robin Mason. (cbscd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
Civil Action:12-cv-01883-MSK-CBS
Date: February 26, 2013
FTR - Reporter Deck-Courtroom A402
Courtroom Deputy: Robin Mason
Parties:
Counsel:
ONLINE TOOLS FOR PARENTS, LLC,
Michael Jacob Laszlo
Theodore E. Laszlo , Jr.
Plaintiff,
v.
TOM VILSACK, et al.,
Marcy Elizabeth Cook
Defendants.
COURTROOM MINUTES/RECOMMENDATION PURSUANT TO RULE 72(B)
HEARING: MOTION HEARING/RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
Court in session:
1:29 p.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
The court addresses the parties regarding the defendant’s MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State
a Claim Amended Complaint (Docket No. 51, filed on 1/8/2013).
Ms. Cook presents oral argument.
Mr. Laslzo presents oral argument.
Discussion between the court and the parties regarding this motion. The court cites relevant case
law.
The court stated, from the bench, its findings and legal basis for its recommendation.
As stated on the record, the court hereby recommends that the defendant's MOTION to Dismiss
for Failure to State a Claim Amended Complaint (Docket No. 51, filed on 1/8/2013) be
DENIED.
The court informs the parties that the 14 days to file objections starts from today's date.
The court addresses the parties regarding the defendant’s Joint MOTION to Stay Discovery
(Docket No. 67, filed on 2/11/2013).
Discussion between the court and the parties regarding discovery.
ORDERED: The court DENIES the defendant’s Joint MOTION to Stay Discovery (Docket
No. 67, filed on 2/11/2013).
Parties have held a Rule 26(f) meeting and Rule 26(a) disclosures have been fulfilled.
THE FOLLOWING WILL CONFIRM THE ACTIONS TAKEN AND DATES SET AT
THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HELD THIS DATE:
Deadline for Amendment of pleadings/Joinder of parties: January 18, 2013
Discovery Cut-off:
November 26, 2013
Dispositive Motions deadline:
January 7, 2014
Parties shall designate affirmative experts on or before September 16, 2013
Parties shall designate rebuttal experts on or before October 28, 2013
Each party shall be limited to four (4) expert witnesses, absent leave of court.
Each party shall be limited to ten (10) depositions, absent leave of court.
Interrogatories, Requests for Production of Documents, and Requests for Admissions shall be
served no later than THIRTY THREE DAYS prior to close of discovery.
A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE was not set.
FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE will be set by Chief Judge Krieger.
Counsel may not file any OPPOSED discovery motions without leave of court. Counsel are
instructed that should a discovery dispute arise they are to comply with Local Rule 7.1A. in
an effort to resolve the issues. If that is unsuccessful, counsel shall establish a conference
call adding Magistrate Judge Shaffer as the last connection. The Court will hear
arguments and attempt to mediate a resolution. The Court will instruct counsel at that
time as to whether or not to file a discovery motion.
TRIAL:
The parties anticipate a one (1) week Bench Trial.
!
Scheduling Order is signed and entered with interlineations.
HEARING CONCLUDED.
Court in recess:
Total time in court:
2:47 p.m.
01:18
To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods
Reporting at (303) 825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?