Madrigal v. Carroll et al

Filing 180

MINUTE ORDER : Granting 178 Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order. Scheduling Order 48 is amended. Discovery due by 8/7/2014. Dispositive Motions due by 9/22/2014. Final Pretrial Conference 7/7/2014 09:00 AM is vacated. Denying without prejudice 136 Motion for Protective Order; denying without prejudice 145 Motion to Deny Defendant's Request for Attorney's Fees. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/11/2014.(emill)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01918-PAB-MJW
MARGARITA MADRIGAL, individually
and on behalf of the Estate of Juan Contreras and as next friend of the minor children,
M. M., a minor child,
R. M. M., a minor child,
J. M., a minor child,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
RANDALL CARROLL, individually and as a Police Officer of the City of Aurora,
CRAIG COLLINS, individually and as a Police Officer of the City of Aurora,
KEVIN ROLLINS, individually and as a Police Officer of the City of Aurora,
LELAND SILVER, individually and as a Police Officer of the City of Aurora
JOHN and JANE DOES, Aurora Police officers whose true names and identifies are
unknown, and
CITY of AURORA, COLORADO, a municipal corporation.

Defendant(s).
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order (Docket
No. 178) is granted as follows, and the Scheduling Order (Docket No. 48) is amended
consistent with this minute order.
This case is stayed until May 9, 2014, which is one week after the next
Settlement Conference scheduled for May 2, 2014. No formal discovery may be done
while the stay is in effect.
The discovery deadline is extended up to and including August 7, 2014, which is
ninety days after the stay is lifted.
The dispositive motion deadline is extended up to and including September 22,
2014, which is forty-five days after the discovery deadline.
The Final Pretrial Conference set on July 7, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. is vacated and will
be reset if the case does not settle.

2
It is further ORDERED that in view of the above as well as the stipulated motion
withdrawing the motions for summary judgment (see Docket Nos. 175 and 176), the
pending motions, namely, the motion for protective order (Docket No. 136) and the
motion to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees (Docket No. 145), are denied
without prejudice and may be refiled if the case does not settle.
Date: April 11, 2014